By:
This February, what was once a staple of bipartisan cooperation in Washington—the annual National Governors Association (NGA) meeting with the president—erupted into a flashpoint of political contention. A long tradition of governors from both major parties gathering at the White House to discuss national and state priorities was undermined this year by disputes over guest lists, fairness, and political inclusion.
A Tradition Under Strain
For decades, the Governor-President meeting held around the NGA’s winter session had brought Republican and Democratic state leaders together. These gatherings have typically offered a rare opportunity in divided Washington for dialogue on infrastructure, public safety, healthcare, energy, and education priorities. This year, however, that tradition faced an unprecedented fracture.
The controversy began when reports surfaced that President Trump planned to invite only Republican governors to the White House business meeting scheduled for February 20, in advance of the NGA’s annual conference in Washington, D.C. Democratic governors were initially excluded from the guest list—prompting immediate criticism from across the political spectrum.
United in the Face of Division
Governors defended the bipartisan institution itself
The clearest point of unity was institutional. Republican and Democratic governors largely agreed that the NGA’s meetings are supposed to be nonpartisan spaces focused on governing, not party loyalty.
- The NGA—chaired by Republican Governor Kevin Stitt—canceled or removed the White House meeting from its official schedule after Democrats were excluded, emphasizing the importance of unity and collaboration.
- Leadership framed the decision around protecting a long-standing bipartisan tradition rather than escalating partisan retaliation.
That matters. In a polarized environment, both sides agreeing on the rules of engagement is a form of bipartisan cohesion. The dispute reinforced the idea that governors, regardless of party, see value in maintaining spaces where policy cooperation can still happen.
Cross-party solidarity around inclusion norms
Another notable moment was that pushback wasn’t strictly partisan:
- Democratic governors threatened to boycott events unless all governors were included, framing the issue around collaboration rather than ideology.
- Republican NGA leadership supported maintaining an inclusive format, signaling discomfort with turning the gathering into a partisan event.
That’s subtle but important. The alignment wasn’t about policy agreement—it was about process and respect for shared institutions, “we can disagree on policy, but the table itself has to stay open.”
A shared recognition of federal-state interdependence
The episode reinforced something governors from both parties consistently say—that federal-state relationships can’t function if meetings become partisan events.
Even governors who disagreed politically signaled that infrastructure, disaster response, economic development, and energy policy require cooperation. The controversy actually highlighted how much governors rely on one another and on federal engagement regardless of party.
The Trump White House Response
The White House defended the president’s discretion over invitations, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying that “the president has the discretion to invite whomever he wants to the White House.”
President Trump took the dispute further on social media, clarifying that invitations had been sent to “all governors” except two Democratic leaders—Maryland’s Governor Wes Moore and Colorado’s Jared Polis—whom he labeled as “not worthy” of attending. He also criticized Oklahoma’s Governor Kevin Stitt, calling him a “RINO” (Republican in Name Only) after Stitt communicated the event changes to his colleagues.
Following the backlash, the White House clarified that all 55 governors and territory leaders were invited to the Friday morning business breakfast. NGA Chairman and Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt confirmed on February 13 that the association would once again include the meeting in its official program. While they restored their sponsorship of the morning business session, the NGA clarified they will not facilitate any event—including the dinner—that does not include all 55 governors.
A Reminder of What Bipartisanship Looks Like
If there was a constructive outcome from this month’s governors’ meeting controversy, it wasn’t policy agreement of political reconciliation—it was boundary-setting. Governors from both parties drew a clear line around the value of shared institutions and the expectation that governing spaces remain open to all states, regardless of party affiliation.
Governors collectively said:
- Bipartisan forums matter
- Exclusion undermines governance
- And the NGA’s role is bigger than any one administration
In pushing back against a partisan format, leaders across the political spectrum reaffirmed the core purpose of the NGA, to provide a forum where practical problem-solving can happen even when Washington is divided. The response showed that while policy disagreements remain deep, there is still bipartisan consensus around process, respect, and the need for collaboration between states and the federal government.
The episode ultimately served as a reminder that bipartisan unity today often doesn’t look like sweeping compromise. Instead, it appears in moments where leaders defend the rules that make cooperation possible in the first place. In that sense, the fallout from the meeting may have strengthened something essential—a shared understanding among governors that effective governance depends on keeping the door open, even when politics makes it difficult.
Join the Conversation
MASA is building a community committed to thoughtful dialogue, shared solutions, and a mkore sensible civic future. If this message resonates, we invite you to engage, contribute, and help repattern how democracy shows up in everyday life.
Follow MASA on LinkedIn and Bluesky for more stories, insights, and opportunities to get involved in building a more united and forward-thinking America.